With a background in marketing and promotion, I found I had a knack for trademark investigation.

I had trademark problems,
read a lot, it all clicked.

Attorneys and non-attorneys
turn to me (
non-attorney).

Here's why:

I read all documents in my trademark investigation.
I help avoid and resolve
simple and complex
trademark problems.

Most trademark problems
are based on marketing
much more than on law.

Self-taught in law from
my own trademark problem,
and now many others,
I think differently than
most trademark lawyers.

30+ years marketing,
brand, product, service
naming experience.

30+ years following
market trends in
all industries.

30+ years assessing
trade customs and practices.

My approach resolves
problems faster and better.



 



Trademark Investigator: trademark problems, opposition, cancellation

Trademark investigation based on marketing helps win in a trademark opposition, cancellation, or office action.
 


Rob Cummings, Trademark Consultant - Not an Attorney, a trademark and business problem investigator conducting investigation to solve trademark problems based on 30+ years of brand and life experience.

Trademark investigation helps resolve trademark problems and helps attorneys and individuals build stronger offenses and defenses for trademark issues.

Recent changes to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) Rules and Procedure require a pre-trial settlement discussion.

If for an opposition or cancellation, the Initial Review (available here) provides detail and investigation helpful in pretrial settlement discussion, and more important, avoiding statements in pretrial settlement discussion that could be unintentionally harmful.

"They filed the withdrawal today. Thank you for all the help and input you provided. You definitely know trademark issues and can draw a good strategy for the resolution." 

Trademarks are brands - sold in commerce - marketed, promoted, advertised.

From 30+ years experience, I found I knew more about brands - marketing, packaging, promotion, distribution - than nearly any trademark attorney ever could - the key.

I found trademark problems are based on marketing principles and concepts, yet few attorneys studied, followed, or were directly involved with brands and brand marketing.

A strategic writer and relentless researcher all along, I had my own trademark problems (below), read a lot, won, it clicked.

The Dupont Factors, used to determine likelihood of confusion, are directly related to brand marketing principles and concepts - not law - which is how it clicked.

My unique approach to trademark investigation involves studying the market, the adversary, trade customs, current and past events, and other factors (rather than often outdated case law), and this approach results in:

  • knowing more about trademark cases with a far deeper understanding

  • knowing more about the parties involved than the opposing attorneys

  • discovery of one or more aspects critical to winning

  • developing best defense and argument based on aspects attorneys overlook

  • solutions to trademark problems present and future

With brand knowledge, tenacity, and investigation that extends well beyond that of nearly all attorneys, I help win trademark cases and overcome trademark problems.

Have a trademark problem? Click here
Need help applying for a trademark? Click here

Winning is certainly possible (with significant study and judgment) in:

  • Trademark opposition
  • Trademark cancellation
  • Response to a trademark office non-final office action
  • Reversing a trademark office final refusal
  • Formal Answer to a Notice of Opposition or Petition to Cancel
  • Overcoming other trademark problems .

You can win without a Trademark Attorney (as I did), however, the only way I was able to win was by learning the hard way... by reading 100's of cases, diligently studying trademark law, gaining insight into how other cases were won (and lost), and spending a tremendous amount of time and effort (i.e. years).

Trademark problems are rooted in marketing, advertising and distribution principles.

Three very important things to understand about any trademark case problem:

  • Ignorance of trademark law is not an excuse

  • A trademark Opposition is a Federal Law Suit in a lower court (the TTAB)

  • The USPTO must treat those 'Pro Se' (on their own) the same as an attorney

If you have an attorney, plan to represent yourself (Pro Se), or are an attorney or in-house counsel, I can help.

Since trademark problems are directly related to current business law, trade customs, and practices, attorneys and law firms that rely on case law often rely on cases that are not current.

Business and trademarks are fluid and ever changing, so a case (or case law) of 5 years ago may not apply today - and more than likely will not.

I stay current, read a lot, follow business, think about how business is changing or has changed, and employ this knowledge as I investigate solutions to trademark problems.

Without relying on case law I have made stronger, more relevant arguments.

Investigation of the facts and the industry have been key to my success.

Self-taught in law, at this point I have read or glanced 1000's of trademark cases.

The combination of 30+ years marketing, branding, packaging, product development and naming experience, with a good grasp of trademark matters, gives me a unique and valuable perspective as this relates to how I resolve trademark problems.

Today, Attorneys and individuals hire me to help win and/or avoid simple as well as extremely complex, intricate trademark problems.

Investigation and research often leads to significant discovery.

In my trademark investigation I have found detail and information that can positively affect the outcome of trademark oppositions, cancellations, and office actions.

Here's the story of the trademark problem(s) I had (and resolved) that led me to doing trademark investigation and case analysis.

By August of 2004, I was able to successfully defend a trademark opposition 'Pro Se' (on my own and without the help of any Attorney) in an interesting, difficult, and unusual trademark inter partes [Latin: between parties] proceeding.

My own in-depth investigation provided important details about the opposer.

Prior to this, I had successfully reversed a final refusal in an ex parte [Latin: by or for one party or by one side] proceeding; involving a final refusal from the trademark examiner for which I filed an appeal and an appeal brief.

Back to the opposition filed against me...

My trademark opposition involved a major International company represented by the senior partner of one of the world's leading intellectual property law firms.

The trademark opposition began when I received an innocent looking Extension of time to oppose on April 8, 2003.

A Notice of Opposition on July 16, 2003 followed the extension of time to oppose.

As is customary, the Notice of Opposition named me (the trademark applicant) as defendant, and the Opposer as the plaintiff.

Also customary, I was given 40 days to file an Answer.

You must file an Answer within the time specified by the TTAB if you receive a Notice of Opposition. If you fail to do so, you can lose the Opposition by default. 

You must also carefully follow other USPTO and TTAB procedures, as well as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Writing and properly filing the Answer may seem simple, though I highly recommend that you have me help in order to avoid further complications and/or contact a highly qualified trademark attorney.

To the layman, and even many attorneys, an Opposition and the appropriate answer are not as they may first appear. In an answer, a boilerplate solution (which many attorneys choose), is definitely not the answer.

Filing the proper Answer to the Notice of Opposition is the first step to winning in a trademark opposition, and the step the Opposer hopes you do not take.

Developing a strong Answer (not typical boilerplate), based on knowledge of the Opposer, the industry, and the specifics of the situation, can set the stage to win.

The time and effort and thought put into the answer sets the foundation for all that follows. Many attorneys fail at this critical stage.

Following investigation, I develop what has been referred to as an 'artful' answer, and this type of answer is the foundation for all that follows.

The answer in a trademark cancellation or opposition can make or break the case.

Opposition dismissed - 'with prejudice' - the best possible outcome.

In the end, not only was the opposition to my mark dismissed, it was dismissed 'with prejudice', meaning that the plaintiff can never bring it up again (the best outcome in a trademark opposition).

This opposition never made it to the tribunal of judges at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board since, after much consideration and research, I successfully convinced the Opposer (through its Attorney) to withdraw the opposition, with prejudice. This took a great deal of strategy, due diligence, and research.

The Opposing party's Attorney had much earlier offered a settlement (which I refused), and offered to withdraw the opposition 'without prejudice' (which I also refused). Once an answer is filed, the opposition cannot be withdrawn 'without prejudice' unless the Opposer has the consent of the other party (which I refused to consent to).

Rather than making quick judgment, investigation not only enabled me to win my case and determine best courses of action, but also, the same investigation is now helpful in defending my mark against any future trademark problem.

Decision reversed in a prior ex parte Trademark Appeal.

Prior to the Opposition, I was successful 'pro se' in an ex parte appeal where I was able to convince the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to reverse its final refusal and allow my trademark to proceed to registration.

As is normal in the process, proceeding to registration allows your trademark to be published for opposition, and, as can happen, a Notice of Opposition was then filed (which I successfully defended).

I filed the ex parte appeal on October 30, 2002 and it was terminated and the decision reversed in my favor on May 23, 2003. My response to a non-final action resulted in a final refusal, at which time I filed the appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The appeal brief I filed December 27, 2002 was the document that convinced the trademark examiner to reverse the decision.

All in all, in every respect, I won... with prejudice - the best way.

If I were an Attorney, I probably would not be able to do all I do as a trademark and brand consultant.

Trademark cases are normally handled by trademark attorneys, yet all trademarks are based on marketing more than law. Learn more >>

"I wish I found you long ago, for trademark and marketing solutions."

Get quick answers to trademark opposition and cancellation questions >>

Click now for helpful trademark problem information >>

Other trademark-related pages:



To process the great deal of information and manipulate it, I use multiple monitors;
legal, graphic, video, audio, text-to-speech readers, OCR, PDF-to-text software, Blackberry, and more, and take full advantage of every tool I can find in doing the
work I do in the Initial Review and afterwards.

Have a trademark problem? Need investigation? Click here.

My services often augment yet are not intended as a substitute for advice from a knowledgeable and qualified trademark attorney licensed to practice trademark law.

Recent changes to TTAB Rules and Procedure require a pre-trial settlement discussion.
If for an opposition or cancellation, the Initial Review (available here) provides detail and investigation helpful in pretrial settlement discussion, and more important, avoiding statements in pretrial settlement discussion that could be unintentionally harmful.


Home

We're connected via broadband